August 15, 2008
Dear Friends:
Last Thursday at Federal Plaza in
downtown Chicago, State Senator James Meeks held a rally to protest the disparity
in funding between rich and poor school districts in Illinois. He urged parents
to boycott the first day of Chicago public school classes and enroll their children
in Winnetka schools. He is also encouraging students to sit-in at various business
offices throughout the Loop.
Since our very first day
in 1996, PCG has been pressing for an increase in the state income tax to address
inadequate and inequitable school funding. Last spring we were one of many groups
that together spent over three months organizing a demonstration just before
the opening of the new school year. The event attracted several hundred marchers,
but limited TV coverage and even less press. A day later, it was as if the event
had never happened.
The coverage is
already more extensive this time around, if only because the notion of poor,
black kids traveling to Winnetka captures the imagination. But there are other
differences. The events which Senator
Meeks is calling for feel more like a civil rights protest than did the
carefully planned march a year ago. Most of those present last Thursday were
members of his huge Salem Baptist Congregation and African American clergy from
Chicago's south and west sides. There is at least a hint of impending civil
disobedience in the air.
Maybe this helps to explain
why some of the responses to Senator Meeks evoke the comments of clergy to whom
Martin Luther King responded while sitting in a Birmingham jail nearly 40 years
ago. One hears, for example, that children must not miss a day, and certainly
not a week, of education in their Chicago schools. Is one day, or even one week,
so important compared to the dream of quality education to which their protests
aspire? One hears also that the tactics of seeking enrollment in Winnetka will
create a political backlash. But how likely is it that passivity in the face
of funding injustice will be rewarded with essential reform any time soon?
When PCG staff
hold forums in churches to discuss tax reform and education funding, we often
hear two responses. The first is that "money does not matter. It won't
make any difference." The answer to this one is clear: "Money does
matter. Research shows that it does." If it didn't, why would wealthier
districts spend more for education in their schools? Further, how does one fund
longer school days, universal pre-school education, and better teachers without
spending money?
The second response
is a close cousin to the first: "Money won't solve the entire problem."
The answer here is, "Perhaps not. Of course we also need better and more
accountable schools. Of course families do have a role to play in the education
of their children." But is it not patronizing at best to invoke these goals
when for years we have denied the funding to poor neighborhoods, mostly African
American in Chicago, which is necessary to achieve them? A section of the Sermon
on the Mount comes to mind: "Why do you see the speck in your neighbor's
eye, but do not notice the log in your own eye?…" (Matthew 7:3)
Perhaps the greatest
tragedy surrounding the issue of funding and school reform is that there is
no good reason why we could not have support for a comprehensive proposal for
funding fairness, school accountability, and other key tax reform issues in
a single legislative package right now. This obviously will not happen under
current leadership in Springfield. But at some point, the opportunity for reform
will emerge.
In the Chicago
metropolitan area, if not the entire nation, we continue to be "separate
and unequal." Is it so surprising, therefore, that we are seeing in the
actions of Rev. Meeks the kind of incipient unrest that led the authors of the
Kerner Commission on Civil Disorders to coin this phrase over forty years ago?
Rev. Alexander
Sharp,
Executive Director